Argumentation-Based Qualitative Preference Modelling with Incomplete and Uncertain Information
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argumentation-Based Qualitative Preference Modelling with Incomplete and Uncertain Information
This paper presents an argumentation-based framework for the modelling of, and automated reasoning about multi-attribute preferences of a qualitative nature. The framework presents preferences according to the lexicographic ordering that is well-understood by humans. Preferences are derived in part from knowledge. Knowledge, however, may be incomplete or uncertain. The main contribution of the ...
متن کاملArgumentation-Based Preference Modelling with Incomplete Information
No intelligent decision support system functions even remotely without knowing the preferences of the user. A major problem is that the way average users think about and formulate their preferences does not match the utility-based quantitative frameworks currently used in decision support systems. For the average user qualitative models are a better fit. This paper presents an argumentationbase...
متن کاملProbabilistic Argumentation with Incomplete Information
We consider augmenting abstract argumentation frameworks with probabilistic information and discuss different constraints to obtain meaningful probabilistic information. Moreover, we investigate the problem of incomplete probability assignments and propose a solution for completing these assignments by applying the principle of maximum entropy.
متن کاملA VIKOR-Based Approach to Group Decision Making With Uncertain Preference Ordinals and Incomplete Weight Information
In this paper, we focus on group decision making problems with uncertain preference ordinals, in which the weight information of decision makers is completely unknown or partly unknown. First of all, the consistency and deviation measures between two uncertain preference ordinals are defined. Based on the two measures, a multi-objective optimization model which aims to maximize the deviation of...
متن کاملPreference aggregation with incomplete information
We show that in an environment of incomplete information, if individual preferences are sufficiently rich, then monotonicity and the Pareto property applied only when there is common knowledge of Pareto dominance imply (i) there must exist a common prior over the smallest common knowledge event and (ii) aggregation must be ex-ante utilitarian with respect to that common prior. This work builds ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Group Decision and Negotiation
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0926-2644,1572-9907
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-011-9274-2